The new pearl harbor revisited Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The new pearl harbor revisited - Essay ExampleZubaydah had honored that some members of the Saudi violet stag family was in support of al-Qaeda and had been informed in advance that there would be terrorist attacks in America on September 11,2001. Besides Posners honesty being in doubt thanks to his past works his entropy was important in preparing the American public on future attacks by Saudi Arabia in efforts to gain control of the richest oil reserves in the world. (Griffin 142) Zubaydah was one of the main characters in the Commissions report plainly even then not even once did the bang mention that three members of the Saudi royal family had known about the attacks of 9/11 including Prince Ahmed. One of the cares duties was to cover up whatever links between Saudi Arabia and the attack of 9/11 and therefore would not mention Posners account of Zubaydahs testimony, for the same reason the CIA destroyed tapes involving Zubaydahs interrogation(Griffin 150). Later Abu Zubay dahs testimony was in doubt with Risen wondering whether his recitation of telephone numbers had been well rehearsed earlier on so as to be employed incase he is captured and create discord between the Saudi royal family, which Osama hated, and America. ... The CIA merely sideed him as a central member of the al-Qaeda with important information to give, a view that was publicly supported by President Bush (Griffin 158). Posners account was in agreement with the FBIs view that Zubaydah produced most information on traditional interrogation and the CIAs view that he was a central person in Al-Qaeda. In both cases Zubaydah gave the names of Jose Padilla and Khalid Mohammed but no Saudi officials were mentioned. With the information publicly available it becomes impossible to determine whether the testimony by Zubaydah as presented by the Posner account was true. This could however could have been possible if there was a thorough investigation which unfortunately the 9/11 tutelage di d not give (Griffin 160) . On the issue of al-Qaeda funding, Zubaydah had mentioned that the terrorists got funds from the Saudis. The commission however, did not even mention this reported claim in their report but instead denied even having found any march of funding from the Saudi government and the senior Saudi officials .Later a Los Angeles Times business relationship presented the information to have been politically instigated. The author of the story, Josh Meyer, had interviewed several senior members of the 9/11 commission. The commission had uncovered that the Saudi Arabian government funded the terrorist group and even provided equipment even maybe directly to Osama. With the commission being bipartisan had wondered how to present this information in its report .They finally decided to deny acquire any information on the funding (Griffin169) The 9/11 commission had sent a memorandum to the FBI headquarters through Ken Williams to which they did not respond. The commis sion decided to down play this by solely